• Home
  • NFL
  • The Top 5 Rookies by Position for Dynasty Fantasy Leagues

The Top 5 Rookies by Position for Dynasty Fantasy Leagues

As Dynasty Fantasy Football enthusiasts gear up for their drafts, identifying rookie prospects who offer long-term value is crucial.

These young talents not only bring fresh energy to their teams but also have the potential to become cornerstone players for years to come.

On the first ever episode of the brand new Dynasty Draft Podcast, Andrew Wilbar and I broke down our Top 5 Rookies by position for Dynasty leagues. These prospects should be your top targets in your upcoming Rookie Drafts.

Whether you’re looking to rebuild or fortify your roster, these rising stars are poised to make significant contributions and could be the key to securing your dynasty’s future success.


QUARTERBACK

The Rookie QB class certainly has some headliners. Led by mega-talent Caleb Williams (CHI) as well as dual-threat athlete Jayden Daniels (WAS), several of these prospects could provide usable Fantasy production early in Year 1.

JEREMY’S TOP 5
  1. Caleb Williams, Chicago Bears
  2. Drake Maye, New England Patriots
  3. Jayden Daniels, Washington Commanders
  4. JJ McCarthy, Minnesota Vikings
  5. Bo Nix, Denver Broncos
ANDREW’S TOP 5
  1. Jayden Daniels, Washington Commanders
  2. Caleb Williams, Chicago Bears
  3. JJ McCarthy, Minnesota Vikings
  4. Drake Maye, New England Patriots
  5. Bo Nix, Denver Broncos

RUNNING BACK

Despite no RBs going in the 1st Round of the 2024 Draft, there are several Rookie runners worthy of targeting early in your Dynasty Drafts. Jonathan Brooks (CAR) was a 1st Round talent who fell because of the ACL injury he suffered in 2023, and Trey Benson (AZ) is as explosive as they come. RBs are still the driving force of fantasy, and there are some high-upside options in this class.

JEREMY’S TOP 5
  1. Jonathan Brooks, Carolina Panthers
  2. Trey Benson, Arizona Cardinals
  3. Jaylen Wright, Miami Dolphins
  4. Blake Corum, Los Angeles Rams
  5. Audric Estime, Denver Broncos
ANDREW’S TOP 5
  1. Jonathan Brooks, Carolina Panthers
  2. Trey Benson, Arizona Cardinals
  3. Jaylen Wright, Miami Dolphins
  4. Blake Corum, Los Angeles Rams
  5. Kimani Vidal, Los Angeles Chargers

WIDE RECEIVER

The 2024 WR class could be legendary, and there are legit Year 1 producers in this group. Marvin Harrison Jr. (AZ) grabs the headlines and landed in a great spot, but don’t sleep on guys like Keon Coleman (BUF) and Xavier Worthy (KC) to have big Rookie seasons in 2024 as well!

JEREMY’S TOP 5
  1. Marvin Harrison, Jr., Arizona Cardinals
  2. Rome Odunze, Chicago Bears
  3. Malik Nabers, New York Giants
  4. Xavier Worthy, Kansas City Chiefs
  5. Ladd McConkey, Los Angeles Chargers
ANDREW’S TOP 5
  1. Marvin Harrison, Jr., Arizona Cardinals
  2. Malik Nabers, New York Giants
  3. Keon Coleman, Buffalo Bills
  4. Rome Odunze, Chicago Bears
  5. Ladd McConkey, Los Angeles Chargers

TIGHT END

Outside of wunderkind prospect Brock Bowers (LV), the 2024 class of TEs is definitely lacking when compared to the incredible class from 2023 which included Year 1 standouts like Sam LaPorta (DET) and Michael Mayer (LV). Still, there are some intriguing future options with upside this year. If you need some TE depth, there’s value to be found in this year’s class.

JEREMY’S TOP 5
  1. Brock Bowers, Las Vegas Raiders
  2. Ja’Tayvion Sanders, Carolina Panthers
  3. Theo Johnson, New York Giants
  4. Ben Sinnott, Washington Commanders
  5. Cade Stover, Houston Texans
ANDREW’S TOP 5
  1. Brock Bowers, Las Vegas Raiders
  2. Ben Sinnott, Washington Commanders
  3. Theo Johnson, New York Giants
  4. Cade Stover, Houston Texans
  5. Jaheim Bell, New England Patriots

Be sure to tune in to the all-new Draft Dynasty Podcast from FFSN wherever you get your podcasts! New episodes every Wednesday throughout the offseason! Check out the very first episode below.

Category: Fantasy Sports

Share & Comment:

SUBSCRIBE TO FFSN!

Sign up below for the latest news, stories and podcasts from our affiliates

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.